hidden-metaphor

Manx Genealogy

Re: Patrick Cain b 1737 bible
In Response To: Re: Patrick Cain b 1737 bible ()

Dear Marg,

I tried to a reply to your e-mail and it was not allowed and this one may not go through either, but will try.

1. Our Patrick was not 1737, he was born July 12, 1717.

2. The only reason I came back on this board was because of the marriage of Adam Caine to An Elinor Stoen marriage whereby Ms. Coakley presented in our line which we had never heard of and it was a Mormon entry.

3. I came to this board by accident surfing the net 5 years ago, and had to share and I have shared my entire line and and the will of Anne Corlett, married to our Adam Caine.

4. Grateful I have been many times thanking Ms. Coakley by thank you notes and gifts to her post in England where she lives and e-mails.

5. I have been bombarded and mistreated unfairly when I have proof of whom I am and it is constantley refuted, that Is why as stated I am waiting for a professional genealogist to get back to me recommended by the Musuem that I sent the books to Ms. Coakley post to take to the Museum whereby Ms. Coakley stated that they would more than likely be rejected and they were, because of no lineage material, only histories, and I told Ms. Coakley she may keep them, one the History of the Baptist church which mentions a FAMILY member was married to a Caine, the other the History of Healing Springs which was about the husband of the Caine family member whom traded to buy the springs and the CAINE'S owned the town and it was Walker's Station named after ALICE Caine's husband and the SLAUGHTERFIELD Batter whereby Patrick Caine Jr, was killled by the Tories. Bothe senior Patrick and Alice are buried in this town and The body of Patrick jr. who was killed by the Tories is buried under a tree in the battle field ground.

5 The BIble is in the possession of a family member, which we are trying to find, which that is our family business to find which one, not the board's, and it is being looked for and last was in the hands of a relative who was a spinster in 1959.

6. I would expect you to protect Ms. Coakley, as mother lion protects her cubs, for I have respect for her, that does not mean I have to agree with her findings, as stated we have had our data for a long time and would not have put our sweat, tears, time and money into a fable.

7. This shall be my last post and I have been on the board for 5 years enjoyed those have helped and have thanked them and will thank those WHO HELPED and I was treated as someone who had to prove every aspect of my ancestry line, and I have not seen this happen to any other postees, as my line was contantly attacked that I was not a MANX, so I defended my line as mother lion with her cubs, but the treatment of me not being a Manx was cruel and hurtful so I defended my line and will always because I do have documentation where our line came into America.

8. I shall miss many whom I have written to on this board and I have thanked many and I have never been ungrateful , I have been grateful, and gracious even when my line was attacked over and over.

9. I will not be posting here again and I am sorry it has come to this.

10. I am Manx descendant and no one can take that away from me.

Kindly yours,

Mrs. Rosa