when I read it I thought it was nearer cottret but noted no obvious children to marriage but I didn't check the original parish reg entry so possibly the 1911 transcriber misread it - I often in such cases also check the Bishops transcripts as these are a contempory copy usually by the same person - witnesses were parish clerk + john m'coutchen (?mchutchin) - so is possibly a good contender - Coulthard as I mentioned earlier in thread is usually a Braddan/douglas name - the entries at this time are somewhat ambiguous as to who is a member of the parish as reads (from my notes) as Wm C + E F of this this parish so Fargher is of braddan + Wm might be ! (however that this period mere residence was enough.