Any comments, errors or omissions gratefully received
The Editor
HTML Transcription
© F.Coakley , 2022
|
Ref
|
Date
|
Brief Description
|
|---|---|---|
| AP_115_1 |
15.3.1822
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. returning papers respecting Mr.Mills,with his opinion thereon,and pointing out that Mr.Mills' letter to the Duke contained fifty-three errors in spelling. |
| AP_115_2 |
20.3.1822
|
Duke to Deemster J.J.Heywood. (copy) saying that he does not consider J.J.H. to be Mr.Mills' accuser any more than he regards himself as his advocate;that he considers any man who has been called to the English or Irish Ber as qualified to practice at the Manx Bar;and that he suggests that J.J.H. should withdraw his letter. |
| AP_115_3 |
3.12.1822
|
Duke to Deemster J.J.Heywood. directing that he be informed of the result of the enquiry into the murder of Margt. Camaish,thet he may transmit it without delay to the Sec. of State. |
| AP_115_4 |
-.7.1822
|
Report (with evidence of witnesses etc.) of an action brought by Peter Bold,editor of the "Rising Sun",against Wm. Roper,whom he accused of having insulted him by publishing a statement that he was an "ungentlemanly coward." |
| AP_115_5 |
21.8.1822
|
Petition of Wm.Roper (a prisoner in Castle Rushen) to Lt.Gov.Smelt asking for a retrial on the grounds that his previous trial,at which he had been found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment,had been conducted by Deemster Heywood in an improper manner. |
| AP_115_6 |
4.12.1822
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. stating that the persons accused of the murder of Margt.Camaish were being held in custody,as their trial could not be proceeded with in the absence of the Attorney-Gen.from the Island and asking what should be done if no one appeared to prosecute om behalf of the Crown. |
| AP_115_7 | - copy of the AP_115_6. - | |
| AP_115_8 |
10.12.1822
|
Duke to Deemster J.J.Heywood. (Copy) enclosing a letter from Att.-Gen. Clarke. |
| AP_115_9 |
10.12.1822
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. stating that his conduct with regard to the admission of Mr.Mark A.Mills to the Manx Bar was dictated entirely by his regard for that institution and for the public good. |
| AP_115_10 |
10.12.1822
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. with an opinion on a point of Manx law. |
| AP_115_11 |
6.3.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Deemster Gawne. complaining that Wm. Roper,an Advocate, had libelled him both as a Gentleman and as a Magistrate. - calling him "a corrupt end perjured Judge", |
| AP_115_12 |
17.3.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. praying that his complaint against Mr. Roper - which is said to have been postponed by direction of the Duke - may be heard without delay. |
| AP_115_13 |
20.3.1823
|
William Roper to the Rt.Hon.Robt.Peel, praying for an enquiry into his trial and imprisonment,and into Manx Court procedure generally. |
| AP_115_14 |
7.4.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. Trivial |
| AP_115_15 |
23.4.1823
|
Duke to Deemster J.J.Heywood. asking for his observations on a request he has recd. from Mr.Peel (Sec.of State) for his remarks on a petition recd, by the Sec. of State from Mr. Roper. |
| AP_115_16 |
24.4.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. acknowledging the above. |
| AP_115_17 |
2.5.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. giving his version,at great length,on what happened at the trial of Mr.Roper. |
| AP_115_18 |
24.5.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. (Extract from) in which the writer denies that an article in the "Rising Sun" with regard to Mr.Roper's complaint against him was inserted with his knowledge or consent. |
| AP_115_19 |
24.5.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. containing the original of the above denial and also copies (attached) of a letter of 9.5.1823 to him from the Sec.or State saying that no proceedings would be taken against him in the Roper case and also one from J.C.Gelling (see below). |
| AP_115_20 |
24.5.1823
|
J.J.Gelling to Deemster J.J.Heywood. denying that a statement in the Rising Sun was due to any breach of confidence on his part. ( Written from Wellington Square) |
| AP_115_21 |
8.7.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. with an a/c of Fees received. Points out that he had done double duty from the dismissal of Deemster Gawne to the arrival of Deemster Christian. |
| AP_115_22 |
28.7.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. enclosing an application,to be sent to the Sec. of State,for extra remuneration on a/c of the double duty performed as above. |
| AP_115_23 |
11.12.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. (From Bemahague. Earlier ones from Summer Hill. N.M.) with his opinion on a legal matter. |
| AP_115_24 |
22.12.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. further to the above. (Refers to Deemster Christian as then living at Fort Ann N.M.) |
| AP_115_25 |
28.12.1823
|
Deemster J.J.Heywood to Duke. trivial. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Any comments, errors or omissions gratefully received
The Editor |
||